|
Volume 1, Issue 3 RETREAD/ECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION AT BRAZILIAN AIRLINES
In Brazil, airlines like VARIG, TAM, GOL and VASP are excellent examples of tire retread utilization. Working closely with Goodyear they have developed a good program of training on aircraft tire care and preventive maintenance with safety as the first priority and cost reduction as an ongoing economic goal. VARIG and TAM Airlines, for instance, operating a fleet of nearly 200 aircraft that include Boeing, Airbus, Fokker, and Embraer jets are quite satisfied with the results of their Goodyear retread programs. These programs yield an average of six retread levels and, in some particular cases, as many as ten to eleven retread levels. In the case of TAM Airlines, specifically considering their fleet of forty-four A319/320 aircraft, their tires are achieving a 95% acceptance level for retreading in all retread levels up to R-9 and reaching 86.8% for R-10. This results from combining a good product with a complete tire care and maintenance program to insure safety and reduced cost. With this combination, these Brazilian airlines have the highest retread and lowest cost per landing levels in the world.
A tire wear evaluation was conducted between February and November 2003 at the University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, where fifty eight (58) main landing gear tires were evaluated for wear characteristics on 29 of UND’s Piper Warrior and Arrow aircraft. Tires evaluated included, Goodyear Flight Custom III, Goodyear Flight Special II and Michelin Air. At approximately every 60 hours of flight time, the tires were checked for remaining tread depth at 3 points in each grove, tire pressure, and the number of landings. Results showed that Goodyear Flight Custom III provided an average of 1386 landings compared to Michelin Air which averaged 953, or 45% more landings on Goodyear Flight Custom III. Goodyear’s less expensive Flight Special tire is comparable in performance to the Michelin Air.
![]()
Changes in the Tilburg plant are huge. The distance a tire now travels in plant has been reduced by a factor of three. Goodyear has also identified the “ideal” number of tires to be processing at any one time. By reducing floor-space used and having every job physically in view to every operator, Goodyear Tilburg has created a better sense of teamwork which was often missing before. Goodyear associates see that over-production as well as under-production has a negative impact and causes waste. Another effect of reduced floor space is the move from a “push” to “pull” production. Instead of having many tires to choose from, the operator has to “pull” the tires from the previous step thereby creating the expectation that there will always be a tire there when he needs one. By having fewer tires in production and verified immediately after receipt, Goodyear Tilburg has much more flexibility to respond to ever increasing customer demands.
Due to the unique landing characteristics of the B747-400, the last row of the body gear, in particular wheel positions #7, 8, 11, and 12 are subject to the most severe operating condition — the last to leave and the first to touch the tarmac. Likewise, tires installed in these four positions experience faster wear and, therefore, require relatively more frequent tire change. According to our experience with B747-400, the difference in landing cycle achieved at different airlines worldwide are predominantly due to the proportion between the fleet’s passenger and freighter mix, and tire pressure checks. Airlines performing daily tire pressure checks experience higher average landing performance resulting in lower airlines operational cost than those airlines that do not perform daily tire pressure checks. ![]()
|